<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZD1211 support in Linux 2.6.18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/</link>
	<description>they got a skin and they put me in</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adan</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/comment-page-1/#comment-9308</link>
		<dc:creator>Adan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/#comment-9308</guid>
		<description>linux vs.windows webhosting.???
I wondered which should be used for dynamics sites using flash css javascript forms etc.
I was looking at this companies corporate plan and would like to have the option to set up several seperate websites for different customers 
assigning each an allotment of space with seperate access by them and allowing me access is this site suitable for my needs or is it as it seems just too good to be true???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linux vs.windows webhosting.???<br />
I wondered which should be used for dynamics sites using flash css javascript forms etc.<br />
I was looking at this companies corporate plan and would like to have the option to set up several seperate websites for different customers<br />
assigning each an allotment of space with seperate access by them and allowing me access is this site suitable for my needs or is it as it seems just too good to be true???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsd</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/comment-page-1/#comment-3913</link>
		<dc:creator>dsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/#comment-3913</guid>
		<description>That was RX performance, it needs to be remeasured now that we have multiple RX URBs on the pipe at any one time. The development repo is the one linked to above, commits will selectively be moved into the kernel by hand (for now). Driver development has been slow lately as I&#039;ve been hacking on the softmac layer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was RX performance, it needs to be remeasured now that we have multiple RX URBs on the pipe at any one time. The development repo is the one linked to above, commits will selectively be moved into the kernel by hand (for now). Driver development has been slow lately as I&#8217;ve been hacking on the softmac layer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zwoch</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/comment-page-1/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>zwoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>ah, ok i knew that url. i thought there would be more commits and therefore this was the repository in question for kernel inclusion and because of that had very conservative commits. i was the opinion i read somewhere that tx performance was poor compared to the original zydas driver and it needed some tweaks. maybe i was wrong here.. never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, ok i knew that url. i thought there would be more commits and therefore this was the repository in question for kernel inclusion and because of that had very conservative commits. i was the opinion i read somewhere that tx performance was poor compared to the original zydas driver and it needed some tweaks. maybe i was wrong here.. never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsd</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>dsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>http://dsd.object4.net/git/?p=zd1211.git;a=summary

I&#039;m not sure what you mean by low TX rate, but it is still user-defined (no automatic adjustment). I have no plans to migrate to devicescape at this time (we are working for kernel inclusion, and devicescape is a long distance away from that) but other people have expressed interest in maintaining a forked version which I fully encourage. git will make it very easy for them to do this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dsd.object4.net/git/?p=zd1211.git;a=summary" rel="nofollow">http://dsd.object4.net/git/?p=zd1211.git;a=summary</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by low TX rate, but it is still user-defined (no automatic adjustment). I have no plans to migrate to devicescape at this time (we are working for kernel inclusion, and devicescape is a long distance away from that) but other people have expressed interest in maintaining a forked version which I fully encourage. git will make it very easy for them to do this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zwoch</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/comment-page-1/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>zwoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/07/zd1211-support-in-linux-2618/#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>wonderful! thanks once again for all your efforts. is there a location to browse the out-of-tree repositores for changes? id love to peek at diffs and looking at the evolving driver. is the low tx rate issue already fixed? what about a transistion to devicescape (its a bit early but i like to hear opinions about the stack - i am just trying to learn and earn knowledge).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful! thanks once again for all your efforts. is there a location to browse the out-of-tree repositores for changes? id love to peek at diffs and looking at the evolving driver. is the low tx rate issue already fixed? what about a transistion to devicescape (its a bit early but i like to hear opinions about the stack &#8211; i am just trying to learn and earn knowledge).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

