<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using git-bisect to find buggy kernel patches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/</link>
	<description>they got a skin and they put me in</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Plante</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-18187</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Plante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-18187</guid>
		<description>Last year, I ran into a v4l problem, and, as my first experience with git, I tried bisecting, but I ran into problems (don&#039;t remember what, but it was more of an issue between me and git, than between me and the kernel), and decided just to download a bunch of tarballs and narrow it down.  I managed to narrow it down to a 4-number release, so I had figured I&#039;d go back into git and try to narrow it down further, but apparently there are no tags for the 4-number versions, and the commit hash (from the release notes, apparently written by Greg KH) was unknown to git on a clone of Linus&#039; repo.

So I gave up and just rewrote the app to use v4l2 (which fixed my issue), but I&#039;m nevertheless curious what I really should have done with the additional info I had about the 4-number release... obviously if it happened now, I wouldn&#039;t even bother with the tarballs, but it&#039;d be nice not to have to build another 10+ kernels above and beyond the minimum if I ever did decide to pick up where I left off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, I ran into a v4l problem, and, as my first experience with git, I tried bisecting, but I ran into problems (don&#8217;t remember what, but it was more of an issue between me and git, than between me and the kernel), and decided just to download a bunch of tarballs and narrow it down.  I managed to narrow it down to a 4-number release, so I had figured I&#8217;d go back into git and try to narrow it down further, but apparently there are no tags for the 4-number versions, and the commit hash (from the release notes, apparently written by Greg KH) was unknown to git on a clone of Linus&#8217; repo.</p>
<p>So I gave up and just rewrote the app to use v4l2 (which fixed my issue), but I&#8217;m nevertheless curious what I really should have done with the additional info I had about the 4-number release&#8230; obviously if it happened now, I wouldn&#8217;t even bother with the tarballs, but it&#8217;d be nice not to have to build another 10+ kernels above and beyond the minimum if I ever did decide to pick up where I left off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Domain</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-18178</link>
		<dc:creator>My Domain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-18178</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joe...&lt;/strong&gt;

Check out my domain sometime....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joe&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Check out my domain sometime&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markos Chandras</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-17674</link>
		<dc:creator>Markos Chandras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-17674</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this great guide :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this great guide :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floroskop</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-16698</link>
		<dc:creator>Floroskop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-16698</guid>
		<description>Hello! 
I think this try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
I think this try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naisioxerloro</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-16390</link>
		<dc:creator>naisioxerloro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-16390</guid>
		<description>Hi. 
Good design, who make it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Good design, who make it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsd</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-14017</link>
		<dc:creator>dsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-14017</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never used cogito. WIth git I would suggest you create a new branch (so that you do not lose the bisection state) and then hard reset to a tag.

# git branch mybranch
# git checkout mybranch
# git reset --hard v2.6.18-rc3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never used cogito. WIth git I would suggest you create a new branch (so that you do not lose the bisection state) and then hard reset to a tag.</p>
<p># git branch mybranch<br />
# git checkout mybranch<br />
# git reset &#8211;hard v2.6.18-rc3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toralf FÃƒÂ¶rster</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-13594</link>
		<dc:creator>Toralf FÃƒÂ¶rster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-13594</guid>
		<description>After bisecting  I would try to compile a specific kernel version. How can I switch to a specific commit (with cogito I could do  &quot;$&gt; cg-seek v2.6.18-rc3&quot;)  but the cogito scritps seems to be buggy, isn&#039;t it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After bisecting  I would try to compile a specific kernel version. How can I switch to a specific commit (with cogito I could do  &#8220;$&gt; cg-seek v2.6.18-rc3&#8243;)  but the cogito scritps seems to be buggy, isn&#8217;t it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pekka Enberg</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Pekka Enberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-833</guid>
		<description>You are not doomed. The old bitkeeper repository has been converted to git and you can find it here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not doomed. The old bitkeeper repository has been converted to git and you can find it here: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git/.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewi</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-756</guid>
		<description>I started to use this approach to fix these infernal crashes I&#039;ve been experiencing for nearly a year... and I came to the horrible realisation that it wasn&#039;t going to work because the last good kernel was 2.6.9 - before git was created. I&#039;m doomed! I really have tried everything. I&#039;m not alone though, another guy with a similar Vaio has the same problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started to use this approach to fix these infernal crashes I&#8217;ve been experiencing for nearly a year&#8230; and I came to the horrible realisation that it wasn&#8217;t going to work because the last good kernel was 2.6.9 &#8211; before git was created. I&#8217;m doomed! I really have tried everything. I&#8217;m not alone though, another guy with a similar Vaio has the same problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2006/01/using-git-bisect-to-find-buggy-kernel-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 01:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/?p=78#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Now only if we could extend this and get git to use Newton&#039;s method, which has *quadratic* convergence. Unfortunately the kernel isn&#039;t a function, nor can we take it&#039;s derivative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now only if we could extend this and get git to use Newton&#8217;s method, which has *quadratic* convergence. Unfortunately the kernel isn&#8217;t a function, nor can we take it&#8217;s derivative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
