[fprint] fprint for embedded
Daniel Drake
dan at reactivated.net
Thu Jan 17 20:47:29 GMT 2008
Jono Woodhouse wrote:
> Did I read correctly that the new libusb-1.0 will require one of the
> latest linux kernels?
That requirement will be dropped soon.
> From a portability point of view it may be good to offer people the
> choice to link to both libusb-0.1 or libusb-1.0 (and then having the
> added functionality).
This won't be realistic, unless someone wants to continue to maintain
and backport stuff to the libfprint-0.1 branch.
> Did you see any noticeable speed performances too?
Not measured, plus my systems are also a bit fast. However I do now have
an embedded unit, a MIPS clone with 4mb RAM and integrated UareU 4000B,
so embedded performance is of possible future interest to me.
> You might find that once libfprint is being included in many of the
> Linux distros that it will have gained enough momentum, that the drivers
> being included just follow suit of all the other driver components and
> remain open. I would imagine that the majority of fingerprint devices
> manufacturers are making their money from the hardware devices, and not
> the software drivers.
I don't think this is reality. I've yet to find a friendly vendor and I
have contacted several.
Thanks,
Daniel
More information about the fprint
mailing list