[fprint] Dependencies on glib/imageMagik
Andrei Tchijov
andrei at tchijov.com
Mon Dec 3 19:59:57 GMT 2007
I think I know the answer now ( after our somewhat prolong discussion
about merits of fpusb ), but I want to ask the question anyhow. Do
you not consider relines to glib ( and imageMagik to some degree ) to
be bad thing? I guess if your development efforts are solidly centered
on Linux, it is not such a big deal to you. Still, considering the
fact that very small number of functions from glib actually used by
fprint ( 26 ) and that only memory allocation/linked list management
functions used for "core" operations in libfprint and considering that
rest of functions are mostly concern file/directory manipulations and
have equivalents available among standard C functions and especially
considering the fact that as I have noticed, you decide NOT to use
glib for list management in fpusp - is there any chance that this
dependency (on glib) will go away in the future?
Sort of along the same lines ... should fprint really use NIST code in
such a "intimate" way? NIST is free/open source/good, but it is not
the only recognition package. What if someone will want to use some
other package? What if some one will not want to use ANY recognition
package at "scanner side" of authentication chain? Will it be nice to
have ability to swap minutia extraction/matching algorithms easily?
Something similar to the way different drivers get "registered" (I do
realize that most often only one finger recognition set of algorithms
will be needed, so it just a question of switching from one to
another). It is even more awkward, considering the fact that many
fingerprint scanners luck imaging ability altogether, so NIST (or any
other recognition software) is rather useless when coupled with such
scanner.
Andrei
More information about the fprint
mailing list